John Haldon, The Empire That
Would Not Die: The Paradox of Eastern Roman Survival, 640–740,
Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press 2016,
432pp.
Contents |
The eastern Roman Empire was the largest state in
western Eurasia in the sixth century. Only a century later, it was a fraction
of its former size. Surrounded by enemies, ravaged by warfare and disease, the
empire seemed destined to collapse. Yet it did not die. In this holistic
analysis, John Haldon elucidates the factors that allowed the eastern Roman
Empire to survive against all odds into the eighth century.
By 700 CE the empire had lost three-quarters of its
territory to the Islamic caliphate. But the rugged geography of its remaining
territories in Anatolia and the Aegean was strategically advantageous,
preventing enemies from permanently occupying imperial towns and cities while
leaving them vulnerable to Roman counterattacks. The more the empire shrank,
the more it became centered around the capital of Constantinople, whose ability
to withstand siege after siege proved decisive. Changes in climate also played
a role, permitting shifts in agricultural production that benefitted the
imperial economy.
At the same time, the crisis confronting the empire
forced the imperial court, the provincial ruling classes, and the church closer
together. State and church together embodied a sacralized empire that held the
emperor, not the patriarch, as Christendom’s symbolic head. Despite its
territorial losses, the empire suffered no serious political rupture. What
remained became the heartland of a medieval Christian Roman state, with a
powerful political theology that predicted the emperor would eventually prevail
against God’s enemies and establish Orthodox Christianity’s world dominion.
No comments:
Post a Comment